Solving Exponential Equations A Step By Step Guide

by ADMIN 51 views

In the realm of mathematics, solving exponential equations is a fundamental skill with widespread applications in various fields, from finance and physics to computer science and engineering. Exponential equations, characterized by a variable appearing in the exponent, often present a unique challenge that requires a strategic approach. This guide provides a comprehensive walkthrough of solving the exponential equation (15,000)−2z⋅5,000−2z+2=5,000\left(\frac{1}{5,000}\right)^{-2 z} \cdot 5,000^{-2 z+2}=5,000, equipping you with the knowledge and techniques to tackle similar problems with confidence. Understanding and manipulating exponential expressions is paramount to solving these equations efficiently. The core principle lies in expressing all terms with the same base, allowing us to equate the exponents and solve for the unknown variable. This involves leveraging exponent rules such as the power of a power rule, the product of powers rule, and the quotient of powers rule. These rules, when applied judiciously, can simplify complex equations and make them more tractable. Moreover, a firm grasp of logarithmic functions can provide an alternative pathway to solving exponential equations, especially when the bases cannot be easily matched. Logarithms, being the inverse of exponential functions, provide a powerful tool for isolating the variable within the exponent. This article will delve into the step-by-step process of solving the given equation, highlighting the key exponent rules and algebraic manipulations involved. By mastering these techniques, you will be well-prepared to solve a wide range of exponential equations and apply these skills to real-world scenarios.

Problem Statement

Let's consider the equation: (15,000)−2z⋅5,000−2z+2=5,000\left(\frac{1}{5,000}\right)^{-2 z} \cdot 5,000^{-2 z+2}=5,000. This equation presents an interesting challenge due to the presence of fractional and negative exponents, as well as the need to manipulate the bases to a common form. To effectively solve this equation, we will employ several key strategies, including rewriting the bases in terms of a common base, applying exponent rules to simplify the expression, and ultimately solving for the variable z. The journey to solving this equation involves a series of transformations and simplifications, each building upon the previous step. Our initial goal is to express all terms in the equation with the same base, which will allow us to equate the exponents and form a simpler algebraic equation. This often involves recognizing common factors or rewriting numbers as powers of a common base. For instance, in this case, we can express both 15,000\frac{1}{5,000} and 5,0005,000 as powers of 5,0005,000, albeit with different exponents. By doing so, we pave the way for applying exponent rules to combine terms and simplify the equation. Another crucial aspect of solving exponential equations is the judicious use of exponent rules. These rules, such as the power of a power rule, the product of powers rule, and the quotient of powers rule, allow us to manipulate exponents in a way that simplifies the equation. For example, the power of a power rule, which states that (am)n=amn(a^m)^n = a^{mn}, is instrumental in simplifying expressions where a power is raised to another power. Similarly, the product of powers rule, which states that am⋅an=am+na^m \cdot a^n = a^{m+n}, allows us to combine terms with the same base by adding their exponents. By skillfully applying these rules, we can transform a complex exponential equation into a more manageable form, ultimately leading to the solution.

Step-by-Step Solution

  1. Rewrite the Bases: The first step in solving this exponential equation is to express all terms with the same base. We can rewrite 15,000\frac{1}{5,000} as 5,000−15,000^{-1}. This allows us to rewrite the equation as follows:

    (5,000−1)−2z⋅5,000−2z+2=5,000(5,000^{-1})^{-2 z} \cdot 5,000^{-2 z+2}=5,000

    Rewriting bases is a crucial technique in simplifying exponential equations. The ability to express numbers as powers of a common base allows us to leverage exponent rules and combine terms effectively. In this case, recognizing that 15,000\frac{1}{5,000} is the reciprocal of 5,0005,000 and can be expressed as 5,000−15,000^{-1} is a key insight. This transformation sets the stage for further simplification and ultimately leads to the solution of the equation. The choice of base is often dictated by the structure of the equation. In this case, 5,0005,000 is the most natural choice as it appears in multiple terms. However, in other scenarios, it might be necessary to decompose numbers into their prime factors and express them as powers of prime numbers. This technique is particularly useful when dealing with equations involving different bases that do not readily appear to be related. Once all terms are expressed with the same base, we can proceed to apply exponent rules to simplify the equation. This involves manipulating the exponents in a way that combines terms and reduces the complexity of the equation. The ultimate goal is to isolate the variable and solve for its value. Rewriting bases is not just a mathematical manipulation; it is a strategic step that unlocks the potential for simplification and provides a clear pathway to solving the equation.

  2. Apply the Power of a Power Rule: Now, we apply the power of a power rule, which states that (am)n=amn(a^m)^n = a^{mn}, to the term (5,000−1)−2z(5,000^{-1})^{-2 z}:

    5,000(−1)(−2z)⋅5,000−2z+2=5,0005,000^{(-1)(-2 z)} \cdot 5,000^{-2 z+2}=5,000

    5,0002z⋅5,000−2z+2=5,0005,000^{2 z} \cdot 5,000^{-2 z+2}=5,000

    The power of a power rule is a cornerstone in the realm of exponent manipulation. This rule, expressed mathematically as (am)n=amn(a^m)^n = a^{mn}, allows us to simplify expressions where a power is raised to another power. In the context of solving exponential equations, this rule is particularly valuable as it enables us to combine exponents and reduce the complexity of the equation. By applying this rule, we effectively eliminate nested exponents, making the equation more amenable to further simplification. In our specific example, we have the term (5,000−1)−2z(5,000^{-1})^{-2 z}. Applying the power of a power rule, we multiply the exponents −1-1 and −2z-2z to obtain 2z2z. This transformation results in the simplified term 5,0002z5,000^{2z}, which is significantly easier to work with than the original expression. The power of a power rule is not just a mathematical formula; it is a tool that empowers us to unravel complex exponential expressions and reveal their underlying structure. By mastering this rule, we gain a deeper understanding of how exponents interact and how they can be manipulated to simplify equations. This skill is essential for solving a wide range of exponential problems and for tackling more advanced mathematical concepts.

  3. Apply the Product of Powers Rule: Next, we use the product of powers rule, which states that amâ‹…an=am+na^m \cdot a^n = a^{m+n}, to combine the terms on the left side of the equation:

    5,0002z+(−2z+2)=5,0005,000^{2 z + (-2 z+2)}=5,000

    5,0002z−2z+2=5,0005,000^{2 z -2 z+2}=5,000

    5,0002=5,0005,000^{2}=5,000

    The product of powers rule is another fundamental principle in the world of exponents. This rule, expressed as am⋅an=am+na^m \cdot a^n = a^{m+n}, allows us to combine terms with the same base by adding their exponents. In the context of solving exponential equations, this rule is invaluable as it enables us to consolidate terms and simplify the equation. By applying the product of powers rule, we can transform a product of exponential expressions into a single exponential expression, making the equation more manageable and easier to solve. In our specific example, we have the expression 5,0002z⋅5,000−2z+25,000^{2 z} \cdot 5,000^{-2 z+2}. Applying the product of powers rule, we add the exponents 2z2z and −2z+2-2z+2 to obtain 2z+(−2z+2)2z + (-2z + 2), which simplifies to 22. This transformation results in the simplified expression 5,00025,000^2, which is a significant step towards solving the equation. The product of powers rule is not just a mathematical formula; it is a tool that empowers us to simplify complex exponential expressions and reveal their underlying structure. By mastering this rule, we gain a deeper understanding of how exponents interact and how they can be manipulated to solve equations. This skill is essential for tackling a wide range of exponential problems and for advancing in mathematical studies. Understanding the nuances of this rule and its applications is crucial for success in various mathematical disciplines.

  4. Equate the Exponents: Now, since the bases are the same, we can equate the exponents. Remember that 5,0005,000 can be written as 5,00015,000^1:

    5,0002=5,00015,000^{2}=5,000^{1}

    However, we made a mistake in the previous step. Let's correct it. After applying the product of powers rule, we should have:

    5,0002z−2z+2=5,0005,000^{2 z -2 z+2}=5,000

    5,0002=5,00015,000^{2}=5,000^{1}

    This step is incorrect because it shows that 5,0002=5,00015,000^2 = 5,000^1 which is not true. There must be an error in the equation or in the previous steps. Let's go back and check the steps.

    Correcting the Mistake: We have the equation:

    (15,000)−2z⋅5,000−2z+2=5,000(\frac{1}{5,000})^{-2 z} \cdot 5,000^{-2 z+2}=5,000

    Step 1: Rewrite the bases

    (5,000−1)−2z⋅5,000−2z+2=5,0001(5,000^{-1})^{-2 z} \cdot 5,000^{-2 z+2}=5,000^1

    Step 2: Apply the power of a power rule

    5,0002z⋅5,000−2z+2=5,00015,000^{2 z} \cdot 5,000^{-2 z+2}=5,000^1

    Step 3: Apply the product of powers rule

    5,0002z+(−2z+2)=5,00015,000^{2 z + (-2 z+2)}=5,000^1

    5,0002z−2z+2=5,00015,000^{2 z -2 z+2}=5,000^1

    5,0002=5,00015,000^{2}=5,000^1

    The error persists. It seems there's a fundamental issue with the equation itself, as the simplification leads to a contradiction. If the equation were correct, equating the exponents would have given us a valid solution for z. However, we arrived at 2=12 = 1, which is impossible. This suggests that either there's a typo in the original equation, or there is no solution.

    When solving exponential equations, the principle of equating exponents is a powerful tool for finding the unknown variable. This method relies on the fundamental property that if am=ana^m = a^n, where a is a positive number not equal to 1, then m must equal n. In other words, if two exponential expressions with the same base are equal, then their exponents must also be equal. This principle allows us to transform an exponential equation into a simpler algebraic equation, which can then be solved using standard algebraic techniques. To apply this principle, it is crucial to ensure that both sides of the equation are expressed with the same base. This often involves rewriting terms using exponent rules or prime factorization. Once the bases are the same, we can equate the exponents and form a linear or quadratic equation, depending on the complexity of the original equation. For instance, if we have the equation 2x+1=232^{x+1} = 2^3, we can directly equate the exponents to get x+1=3x+1 = 3, which can then be solved for x. The principle of equating exponents is not only a powerful problem-solving technique but also a fundamental concept in understanding the behavior of exponential functions. It highlights the one-to-one correspondence between exponential expressions with the same base and their exponents. This understanding is essential for solving a wide range of exponential problems and for applying exponential functions in various fields, such as finance, physics, and computer science. In our case, since we have reached a contradiction, we conclude that the original equation likely has an error or no solution.

  5. Solve for z (If Possible): Since we have a contradiction (2=12 = 1), there is likely an error in the original equation, or there is no solution. If we had a valid equation, we would solve the resulting algebraic equation for z. However, as it stands, we cannot proceed further.

    Solving for the variable in an exponential equation is the ultimate goal of the simplification process. Once we have successfully applied exponent rules and equated the exponents, we are left with a standard algebraic equation that can be solved using familiar techniques. The nature of the algebraic equation depends on the complexity of the original exponential equation. It could be a linear equation, a quadratic equation, or even a more complex polynomial equation. Regardless of the type of equation, the fundamental principles of algebra apply. We use inverse operations to isolate the variable and determine its value. For example, if we have a linear equation such as 2z+1=52z + 1 = 5, we can subtract 1 from both sides and then divide by 2 to find the value of z. If we encounter a quadratic equation, we may need to use factoring, the quadratic formula, or completing the square to find the solutions. In some cases, the algebraic equation may have no real solutions, indicating that the original exponential equation also has no real solutions. It is also important to check the solutions obtained to ensure they are valid in the context of the original equation. Sometimes, extraneous solutions may arise due to the algebraic manipulations performed. These solutions must be discarded as they do not satisfy the original equation. Solving for the variable is the culmination of the problem-solving process. It requires a solid understanding of algebraic techniques and the ability to apply them judiciously. By mastering these skills, we can confidently tackle a wide range of exponential equations and extract valuable information about the relationships between variables.

Conclusion

In summary, while attempting to solve the equation, we encountered a contradiction, indicating a likely error in the original equation or the absence of a solution. The steps we took – rewriting the bases, applying the power of a power rule, applying the product of powers rule, and attempting to equate exponents – are the standard procedures for solving exponential equations. When these steps lead to a contradiction, it's a strong indication that the problem, as presented, is flawed. In conclusion, solving exponential equations requires a systematic approach, a firm grasp of exponent rules, and careful attention to detail. While this particular problem appears to have an issue, the methods discussed are applicable to a wide range of exponential equations.

The journey of solving exponential equations is a testament to the power of mathematical reasoning and the importance of meticulous execution. Each step, from rewriting bases to equating exponents, builds upon the previous one, leading us closer to the solution. However, as we encountered in this particular problem, sometimes the path leads to a contradiction, revealing a flaw in the equation itself. This underscores the importance of critical thinking and the ability to recognize inconsistencies in mathematical problems. While the absence of a solution in this case might seem like a setback, it is in fact a valuable learning experience. It teaches us to be vigilant in our problem-solving approach and to question the assumptions we make. It also highlights the interconnectedness of mathematical concepts and the importance of having a solid foundation in the fundamentals. Solving exponential equations is not just about finding a numerical answer; it is about developing a logical and systematic approach to problem-solving. It is about honing our critical thinking skills and learning to recognize patterns and inconsistencies. These skills are not only valuable in mathematics but also in various other disciplines and in everyday life. The process of grappling with a challenging problem, even if it leads to a dead end, ultimately strengthens our problem-solving abilities and makes us more resilient in the face of future challenges. Therefore, the journey itself is as important as the destination, and the lessons learned along the way are invaluable.