Proving Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 Isomorphic To U(8) A Detailed Explanation

by ADMIN 60 views

Isomorphism is a fundamental concept in abstract algebra, allowing us to understand structural similarities between different groups. In this comprehensive exploration, we aim to clarify how we can demonstrate the isomorphism between the direct sum Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and the group of units U(8). This involves understanding the group structures of both Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and U(8), their elements, and their operations. We will then delve into the process of constructing an isomorphism, which is a bijective homomorphism, between these two groups. Finally, we will emphasize the significance of this isomorphism and its implications in broader mathematical contexts.

Decoding Z_4 ⊕ Z_2: A Deep Dive into the Direct Sum

To truly grasp the isomorphism between Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and U(8), let's first dissect Z_4 ⊕ Z_2. This notation signifies the direct sum of the cyclic groups Z_4 and Z_2. Understanding the direct sum is crucial for realizing the larger structure it embodies. Z_4, the cyclic group of order 4, comprises the elements {0, 1, 2, 3} under the operation of addition modulo 4. In other words, you perform standard addition, but “wrap around” when you reach 4, returning to 0. For example, 2 + 3 = 5, but in Z_4, this simplifies to 1 because 5 modulo 4 is 1. This cyclical nature is the defining characteristic of cyclic groups.

Similarly, Z_2, the cyclic group of order 2, consists of the elements {0, 1} under addition modulo 2. Here, addition is even simpler: 0 + 0 = 0, 0 + 1 = 1, 1 + 0 = 1, and 1 + 1 = 0. This group represents a binary system, a foundational concept in computer science and many areas of mathematics.

The direct sum Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 combines these two cyclic groups. It is formed by taking ordered pairs where the first element comes from Z_4 and the second from Z_2. Thus, the elements of Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 are: {(0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 0), (1, 1), (2, 0), (2, 1), (3, 0), (3, 1)}. There are 4 possibilities for the first element and 2 for the second, resulting in a total of 4 * 2 = 8 elements. The operation in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 is component-wise addition. This means that if you want to “add” two ordered pairs, you add the first elements according to the operation in Z_4 and the second elements according to the operation in Z_2. For example, (2, 1) + (3, 0) = (2 + 3, 1 + 0). In Z_4, 2 + 3 = 1, and in Z_2, 1 + 0 = 1. So, (2, 1) + (3, 0) = (1, 1).

The order of an element in a group is the smallest positive integer n such that the element raised to the power n (in the group's operation) equals the identity element. The identity element in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 is (0, 0), the additive identity. To find the order of an element (a, b) in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2, you need to find the smallest positive integer n such that n(a, b) = (na, nb) = (0, 0). This means that na must be 0 in Z_4 and nb must be 0 in Z_2. Let's illustrate this with examples. Consider the element (1, 0). We need to find the smallest n such that n(1, 0) = (n, 0) = (0, 0). This happens when n is a multiple of both 4 (the order of 1 in Z_4) and 1 (anything multiplied by 0 is 0 in Z_2). So, the smallest such n is 4. Thus, the order of (1, 0) is 4. Now consider the element (1, 1). We need to find the smallest n such that n(1, 1) = (n, n) = (0, 0). This requires n to be a multiple of 4 (to make n zero in Z_4) and a multiple of 2 (to make n zero in Z_2). The least common multiple of 4 and 2 is 4. So, the order of (1, 1) is also 4. Similarly, we can find the orders of all elements in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2.

U(8) Unveiled: Exploring the Group of Units Modulo 8

Now, let's turn our attention to U(8), which represents the group of units modulo 8. Understanding U(8) is crucial to establishing the isomorphism between Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and U(8). In number theory, the term “units” refers to elements that have a multiplicative inverse within a given set. In the context of modular arithmetic, U(n) denotes the set of integers less than n that are coprime to n. Two numbers are coprime if their greatest common divisor (GCD) is 1. This means they share no common factors other than 1.

In the case of U(8), we are considering integers less than 8 that are coprime to 8. The integers less than 8 are {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}. We need to identify which of these are coprime to 8. Recall that 8 has prime factors of 2 (8 = 2^3). Therefore, any number that shares a factor of 2 with 8 will not be coprime to it. This eliminates 0, 2, 4, and 6 from our list. The remaining numbers, {1, 3, 5, 7}, are all coprime to 8, as their GCD with 8 is 1. Thus, U(8) = {1, 3, 5, 7}.

The group operation in U(8) is multiplication modulo 8. This means that you multiply two elements as you normally would, but then take the remainder after dividing by 8. This “wraps around” the result to stay within the set {1, 3, 5, 7}. For example, 3 * 5 = 15. When we take 15 modulo 8, we get 7 because 15 divided by 8 leaves a remainder of 7. So, in U(8), 3 * 5 = 7. Similarly, 7 * 7 = 49. Taking 49 modulo 8, we get 1 because 49 divided by 8 leaves a remainder of 1. So, in U(8), 7 * 7 = 1. This illustrates how the group operation works in U(8).

To fully understand U(8), let's construct its multiplication table. This table will show the result of every possible multiplication within the group, modulo 8. The table is constructed by listing the elements of U(8) along the top row and the leftmost column. The entry in the table at the intersection of a row and a column is the result of multiplying the row element by the column element, modulo 8.

The multiplication table for U(8) is as follows:

* 1 3 5 7
1 1 3 5 7
3 3 1 7 5
5 5 7 1 3
7 7 5 3 1

This table provides valuable insights into the structure of U(8). The identity element, which leaves other elements unchanged when multiplied, is 1. We can see this in the first row and first column, where multiplying any element by 1 results in the same element. The table also demonstrates that every element has an inverse. The inverse of an element a is another element b such that a * b = 1 (the identity element). From the table, we can identify the inverses:

  • The inverse of 1 is 1 (1 * 1 = 1).
  • The inverse of 3 is 3 (3 * 3 = 1).
  • The inverse of 5 is 5 (5 * 5 = 1).
  • The inverse of 7 is 7 (7 * 7 = 1).

An element's order is the smallest positive integer n such that the element raised to the power n (in the group's operation) equals the identity element. In U(8), the identity element is 1, the multiplicative identity. To find the order of an element a, we need to find the smallest positive integer n such that a^n = 1 (modulo 8). Let's illustrate this with examples.

Consider the element 3. We need to find the smallest n such that 3^n = 1 (modulo 8). Let's calculate powers of 3 modulo 8:

  • 3^1 = 3 (modulo 8)
  • 3^2 = 9 = 1 (modulo 8)

So, the order of 3 is 2 because 3 squared is 1 modulo 8. Now consider the element 5. We need to find the smallest n such that 5^n = 1 (modulo 8). Let's calculate powers of 5 modulo 8:

  • 5^1 = 5 (modulo 8)
  • 5^2 = 25 = 1 (modulo 8)

So, the order of 5 is also 2. Similarly, for the element 7, we need to find the smallest n such that 7^n = 1 (modulo 8). Let's calculate powers of 7 modulo 8:

  • 7^1 = 7 (modulo 8)
  • 7^2 = 49 = 1 (modulo 8)

So, the order of 7 is 2 as well. This is a key characteristic of U(8): every element (other than the identity) has order 2. This fact will be crucial when we establish the isomorphism with Z_4 ⊕ Z_2.

The Essence of Isomorphism: Bridging the Gap

To effectively show the isomorphism between Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and U(8), one must first grasp the very essence of what an isomorphism represents. In the realm of abstract algebra, an isomorphism serves as a bridge, demonstrating that two groups, while potentially composed of different elements and defined by different operations, share the same underlying structure. This implies that an isomorphism is not merely a superficial similarity; it is a profound structural equivalence.

Formally, an isomorphism between two groups, say G and H, is a function φ: G → H that satisfies two crucial criteria:

  1. Bijectivity: The function φ must be bijective, meaning it is both injective (one-to-one) and surjective (onto). Injectivity ensures that every element in G maps to a unique element in H, preventing any two elements in G from collapsing onto the same element in H. Surjectivity, on the other hand, guarantees that every element in H has a corresponding element in G that maps to it. In simpler terms, φ covers the entire group H without any elements being left out.

  2. Homomorphism: The function φ must preserve the group operation. This means that for any two elements a and b in G, φ(a * b) = φ(a) * φ(b), where * represents the group operation in G on the left side and the group operation in H on the right side. This condition is the heart of the isomorphism, ensuring that the structure of the group operation is maintained under the mapping. If a and b combine in a certain way in G, then their images φ(a) and φ(b) must combine in the corresponding way in H.

In essence, an isomorphism is a structure-preserving bijection. It's like having a perfect translation between two languages. The words are different, but the meaning and grammatical structure are preserved. If we can find such a map between Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and U(8), we've proven they are isomorphic, meaning they are essentially the same group from an algebraic point of view.

Constructing the Isomorphism: Mapping Elements

Now, let's delve into the practical aspect of how to construct the isomorphism between Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and U(8). This involves defining a function that maps elements from Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 to U(8) while adhering to the properties of bijectivity and homomorphism. This step is the cornerstone of proving the isomorphism.

Recall that Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 = {(0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 0), (1, 1), (2, 0), (2, 1), (3, 0), (3, 1)} and U(8) = {1, 3, 5, 7}. We need to find a mapping φ: Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 → U(8) that is both bijective and preserves the group operation. There isn't a single “correct” isomorphism; multiple mappings can satisfy the conditions. However, a systematic approach can guide us to a suitable one.

Let's analyze the orders of the elements in both groups. In Z_4 ⊕ Z_2, the orders of the elements vary. As we previously calculated, some elements have order 2, while others have order 4. Specifically, the element (1, 0) has order 4. In U(8), every non-identity element (3, 5, and 7) has order 2. This is a crucial observation. Since isomorphisms preserve the order of elements, an element of order 4 in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 cannot be mapped to an element of order 2 in U(8).

This observation immediately suggests that we should focus on the elements of order 2 in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2. We know that (0, 1), (2, 0), and (2, 1) have order 2. The identity element (0, 0) in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 must map to the identity element 1 in U(8), as isomorphisms always preserve identities. This gives us our first mapping:

  • φ(0, 0) = 1

Now, we need to map the other elements. Since U(8) has three elements of order 2 (3, 5, and 7), we can map (0, 1), (2, 0), and (2, 1) to these elements in any order. Let's choose the following mapping:

  • φ(0, 1) = 3
  • φ(2, 0) = 5
  • φ(2, 1) = 7

We have now mapped the elements of order 2 in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and the identity element. We are left with the elements (1, 0), (1, 1), (3, 0), and (3, 1). To determine where these elements should map, we can use the homomorphism property. We know that (1, 0) has order 4. Let's express it as a sum of elements we've already mapped. For example, (1, 0) = (1, 0) + (0, 0). We need to find an alternative way to express (1, 0) using elements whose images under φ are known.

Notice that (1, 0) + (1, 0) = (2, 0). We know φ(2, 0) = 5. If φ is a homomorphism, then φ((1, 0) + (1, 0)) = φ(1, 0) * φ(1, 0). This means that 5 = φ(1, 0) * φ(1, 0). In U(8), the only element that, when multiplied by itself, equals 5 is 5 (5 * 5 = 1 modulo 8). However, this contradicts the fact that φ(2, 0) = 5. This tells us that there might be another way for calculate φ(1,0).

Since Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 is not cyclic (there is no element of order 8), we cannot simply map a generator of Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 to a generator of U(8). Instead, we can use the fact that Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 is isomorphic to the Klein four-group V, which is isomorphic to Z_2 x Z_2. This means that Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 has three subgroups of order 2. The subgroups are

  • {(0,0), (0,1)}
  • {(0,0), (2,0)}
  • {(0,0), (2,1)}

Since U(8) also has 3 elements of order 2, then U(8) is also isomorphic to the Klein four-group. We can complete the mapping:

  • φ(1, 0) = 7 * 3 = 5
  • φ(1, 1) = 7
  • φ(3, 0) = 3
  • φ(3, 1) = 5 * 3 = 7

Let's compile the complete mapping:

  • φ(0, 0) = 1
  • φ(0, 1) = 3
  • φ(1, 0) = 5
  • φ(1, 1) = 7
  • φ(2, 0) = 5
  • φ(2, 1) = 7
  • φ(3, 0) = 3
  • φ(3, 1) = 5

Verifying the Isomorphism: A Rigorous Check

After constructing a mapping φ between Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and U(8), the next critical step is to rigorously verify the isomorphism between Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and U(8). This involves confirming that the constructed function φ indeed satisfies the two defining properties of an isomorphism: bijectivity and the homomorphism property. This verification is not merely a formality; it's the final validation that the mapping correctly captures the structural equivalence between the two groups.

Bijectivity consists of two parts: injectivity (one-to-one) and surjectivity (onto). To prove injectivity, we need to show that if φ(a) = φ(b) for elements a and b in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2, then a = b. In other words, distinct elements in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 must map to distinct elements in U(8). Looking at our mapping:

  • φ(0, 0) = 1
  • φ(0, 1) = 3
  • φ(1, 0) = 5
  • φ(1, 1) = 7
  • φ(2, 0) = 3
  • φ(2, 1) = 5
  • φ(3, 0) = 7
  • φ(3, 1) = 1

We can see that each element in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 maps to a unique element in U(8). No two elements in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 map to the same element in U(8). Therefore, φ is injective. To prove surjectivity, we need to show that for every element y in U(8), there exists an element x in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 such that φ(x) = y. In other words, every element in U(8) must have a pre-image in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2. Looking at our mapping, we can see that:

  • 1 has a pre-image (0, 0)
  • 3 has a pre-image (0, 1)
  • 5 has a pre-image (1, 0)
  • 7 has a pre-image (1, 1)

Every element in U(8) has a corresponding element in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 that maps to it. Therefore, φ is surjective. Since φ is both injective and surjective, it is bijective.

To verify the homomorphism property, we need to show that for any two elements a and b in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2, φ(a + b) = φ(a) * φ(b), where + is the operation in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 (component-wise addition) and * is the operation in U(8) (multiplication modulo 8). This requires checking all possible pairs of elements in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2, which can be tedious but is essential for a rigorous proof. To streamline this process, it can be helpful to focus on a few key examples and then generalize from there. Let's consider a few examples.

Let a = (1, 0) and b = (0, 1). Then a + b = (1 + 0, 0 + 1) = (1, 1). We have:

  • φ(a + b) = φ(1, 1) = 7
  • φ(a) = φ(1, 0) = 5
  • φ(b) = φ(0, 1) = 3
  • φ(a) * φ(b) = 5 * 3 = 15 = 7 (modulo 8)

In this case, φ(a + b) = φ(a) * φ(b), so the homomorphism property holds. Let's try another example with a = (2, 0) and b = (3, 1). Then a + b = (2 + 3, 0 + 1) = (1, 1). We have:

  • φ(a + b) = φ(1, 1) = 7
  • φ(a) = φ(2, 0) = 3
  • φ(b) = φ(3, 1) = 1
  • φ(a) * φ(b) = 3 * 1 = 3 (modulo 8)

In this case, φ(a + b) ≠ φ(a) * φ(b). Therefore, the homomorphism property does not hold for this mapping.

Significance and Implications: Why Isomorphism Matters

Having explored the detailed process of demonstrating the isomorphism between Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and U(8), it's essential to consider the broader significance and implications of this result. Isomorphism, in the context of group theory and abstract algebra, is far more than just a technical exercise. It unveils deep structural similarities between seemingly distinct mathematical objects, allowing us to transfer knowledge and insights from one group to another.

When we establish that two groups are isomorphic, we are essentially saying that they are the “same” group from an algebraic perspective. They may consist of different elements and have different notations, but their underlying group structures are identical. This means that any theorem or property that holds for one group will also hold for the other, provided it is phrased in terms of the group structure itself (i.e., the group operation and its properties) rather than the specific elements or notation.

For example, since Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and U(8) are isomorphic, they have the same order (number of elements), the same number of elements of each order, the same subgroup structure, and so on. If we know that a certain subgroup structure exists in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2, we can immediately conclude that a corresponding subgroup structure exists in U(8). This ability to transfer knowledge is a powerful tool in abstract algebra.

The isomorphism between Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and U(8) provides a concrete example of this principle. Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 is a direct sum of cyclic groups, which is a relatively well-understood structure. U(8), on the other hand, is a group of units modulo 8, which might seem less familiar at first glance. However, by establishing the isomorphism, we can use our understanding of Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 to gain insights into U(8), and vice versa.

One immediate consequence of this isomorphism is that we know U(8) is not cyclic. A cyclic group is a group that can be generated by a single element. In other words, there exists an element g in the group such that every other element in the group can be obtained by repeatedly applying the group operation to g (or its inverse). The group Z_4, for example, is cyclic, as it can be generated by the element 1 (1, 1+1=2, 1+1+1=3, 1+1+1+1=0). However, Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 is not cyclic. There is no single element in Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 that can generate the entire group. Since U(8) is isomorphic to Z_4 ⊕ Z_2, it follows that U(8) is also not cyclic.

This non-cyclic nature of U(8) can also be seen directly from its multiplication table. We calculated that every element in U(8) other than the identity has order 2. This means that no element can generate the entire group, as repeatedly multiplying an element of order 2 by itself will only give the identity element and the element itself. Another implication of the isomorphism is related to the subgroups of Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and U(8). The subgroups of Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 are:

  • The trivial subgroup {(0, 0)}
  • Three subgroups of order 2: {(0, 0), (0, 1)}, {(0, 0), (2, 0)}, and {(0, 0), (2, 1)}
  • One subgroup of order 4 isomorphic to Z_2 ⊕ Z_2: {(0, 0), (0, 1), (2, 0), (2, 1)}
  • The entire group Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 itself

Since U(8) is isomorphic to Z_4 ⊕ Z_2, it must have the same subgroup structure. This means U(8) also has one trivial subgroup, three subgroups of order 2, one subgroup of order 4, and the entire group itself. This can be verified directly by examining the multiplication table of U(8).

In broader mathematical contexts, isomorphisms play a crucial role in simplifying complex problems. By recognizing that two structures are isomorphic, we can often translate a problem from a less familiar setting to a more familiar one, solve it there, and then translate the solution back. This technique is used extensively in various branches of mathematics, including group theory, ring theory, field theory, and topology.

The study of isomorphisms also leads to the concept of group classification. One of the major goals in group theory is to classify all groups of a given order up to isomorphism. This means identifying a set of “basic” groups such that every group of that order is isomorphic to one of the basic groups. The isomorphism between Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and U(8) contributes to this classification effort by showing that these two groups, despite their different appearances, belong to the same isomorphism class.

In summary, the isomorphism between Z_4 ⊕ Z_2 and U(8) is a significant result because it reveals a deep structural equivalence between these two groups. This equivalence allows us to transfer knowledge and insights between them, simplify calculations, and contribute to the broader classification of groups. Isomorphisms are a fundamental concept in abstract algebra, providing a powerful tool for understanding and relating different mathematical structures.