Equivalence Of Algebraic Expressions Justification And Analysis

by ADMIN 64 views

In the realm of algebra, determining the equivalence of expressions is a fundamental skill. This article delves into the process of justifying whether the expression −3x(5−4)+3(x−6)-3x(5-4) + 3(x-6) is indeed equivalent to −12x−6-12x - 6. We will meticulously analyze the given options, employing the principles of algebraic manipulation and substitution to arrive at a conclusive answer. This exploration will not only provide a solution to the specific problem but also enhance your understanding of algebraic equivalence, a crucial concept for success in mathematics.

The Core Question Exploring Algebraic Equivalence

The central question we aim to address is whether the algebraic expression −3x(5−4)+3(x−6)-3x(5-4) + 3(x-6) is equivalent to −12x−6-12x - 6. This type of problem is a cornerstone of algebra, testing our ability to simplify expressions, apply the distributive property, and combine like terms. To determine equivalence, we need to manipulate one or both expressions until they are in the same form or, alternatively, find a value for x that yields different results for each expression, thus proving they are not equivalent. This exploration requires a systematic approach, leveraging the fundamental rules of algebra to ensure accuracy and clarity.

Dissecting Option A A Critical Examination

Option A posits that the expressions are not equivalent because substituting x = 2 into both expressions yields different results. Specifically, it states that −3(2)(5−4)+3(2−6)=−18-3(2)(5-4) + 3(2-6) = -18 and −12(2)−6=−30-12(2) - 6 = -30. To evaluate this claim, we must meticulously perform the calculations.

First, let's simplify the left-hand expression: −3x(5−4)+3(x−6)-3x(5-4) + 3(x-6). Substituting x = 2, we get −3(2)(5−4)+3(2−6)-3(2)(5-4) + 3(2-6). Following the order of operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS), we simplify within the parentheses first: 5 - 4 = 1 and 2 - 6 = -4. Now the expression becomes −3(2)(1)+3(−4)-3(2)(1) + 3(-4). Next, we perform the multiplications: -3 * 2 * 1 = -6 and 3 * -4 = -12. Finally, we add the results: -6 + (-12) = -18. Thus, the left-hand expression evaluates to -18 when x = 2.

Now, let's evaluate the right-hand expression: −12x−6-12x - 6. Substituting x = 2, we get −12(2)−6-12(2) - 6. Performing the multiplication first: -12 * 2 = -24. Then, we subtract: -24 - 6 = -30. Therefore, the right-hand expression evaluates to -30 when x = 2.

Since the two expressions yield different results (-18 and -30) when x = 2, Option A correctly identifies that the expressions are not equivalent. This is a crucial demonstration of how substituting a specific value for a variable can quickly reveal whether two algebraic expressions are truly equivalent.

In-Depth Analysis of Algebraic Expressions

To gain a deeper understanding, let's dissect each expression individually and then compare their simplified forms. This approach will not only validate the results obtained through substitution but also provide a comprehensive view of their algebraic structure. This detailed examination is essential for mastering the concept of algebraic equivalence and for tackling more complex problems in algebra.

Simplifying the First Expression: −3x(5−4)+3(x−6)-3x(5-4) + 3(x-6)

Our first task is to simplify the expression −3x(5−4)+3(x−6)-3x(5-4) + 3(x-6) using the order of operations and the distributive property. This process involves several steps, each of which must be executed meticulously to ensure accuracy. The goal is to reduce the expression to its simplest form, making it easier to compare with other expressions.

  1. Simplify Within Parentheses: The innermost parentheses contain the expression (5-4), which simplifies to 1. The expression (x-6) remains as it is since x is a variable.
  2. Apply the Distributive Property: Next, we apply the distributive property to both terms. For the first term, -3x(1) simplifies to -3x. For the second term, 3(x-6) becomes 3x - 36, which simplifies to 3x - 18.
  3. Combine Like Terms: Now, we combine the like terms. The expression becomes -3x + 3x - 18. The terms -3x and +3x cancel each other out, leaving us with -18.

Therefore, the simplified form of the expression −3x(5−4)+3(x−6)-3x(5-4) + 3(x-6) is -18. This result is crucial for our subsequent comparison with the second expression. The simplification process highlights the importance of following the correct order of operations and applying algebraic properties accurately.

Simplifying the Second Expression: −12x−6-12x - 6

The second expression, −12x−6-12x - 6, is already in a relatively simplified form. There are no parentheses or like terms to combine. This means that the expression cannot be simplified further using basic algebraic manipulations. Its current form makes it straightforward to evaluate for different values of x and to compare with other simplified expressions.

Comparing Simplified Expressions A Key Insight

Having simplified the first expression to -18 and recognizing that the second expression, -12x - 6, cannot be simplified further, we can now directly compare them. It is immediately apparent that the two expressions are not equivalent. One expression is a constant (-18), while the other is a linear expression in terms of x (-12x - 6). For the two expressions to be equivalent, they must yield the same result for all possible values of x. However, since one is a constant and the other varies with x, they cannot be equivalent.

The Decisive Conclusion Evaluating Algebraic Equivalence

Based on our detailed analysis, we can definitively conclude that the expressions −3x(5−4)+3(x−6)-3x(5-4) + 3(x-6) and −12x−6-12x - 6 are not equivalent. Option A provides a valid justification for this conclusion by demonstrating that substituting x = 2 into both expressions yields different results. This method of substitution is a powerful tool for quickly determining whether two algebraic expressions are equivalent. Furthermore, our simplification of the expressions to -18 and -12x - 6, respectively, provides an additional layer of confirmation, reinforcing the understanding that these expressions represent different algebraic relationships.

Key Takeaways and Practical Applications

This exploration underscores the importance of several key algebraic concepts: the order of operations, the distributive property, combining like terms, and the method of substitution. These tools are fundamental for manipulating and simplifying algebraic expressions, which is a crucial skill in various mathematical contexts. Understanding algebraic equivalence is not only essential for solving equations and inequalities but also for more advanced topics such as calculus and linear algebra.

Practical Applications in Real-World Scenarios

The principles of algebraic equivalence extend beyond the classroom and have practical applications in various real-world scenarios. For example, in finance, understanding how different interest rate formulas are equivalent can help in making informed decisions about investments. In engineering, simplifying complex equations is crucial for designing structures and systems. Even in everyday problem-solving, the ability to manipulate and simplify expressions can be invaluable.

Mastering Algebraic Equivalence A Pathway to Success

Mastering the concept of algebraic equivalence is a significant step toward mathematical proficiency. It requires a solid understanding of fundamental algebraic principles and the ability to apply them consistently and accurately. By practicing simplification techniques and utilizing methods such as substitution, you can develop a strong foundation in algebra and prepare yourself for more advanced mathematical challenges.

In conclusion, the journey through this problem has provided not only a solution but also a comprehensive exploration of algebraic equivalence, highlighting its importance and practical applications. Understanding these concepts will undoubtedly contribute to your success in mathematics and beyond.